Sunday, November 26, 2006

 

"Vixen" was taken

Remember that advertising campaign that NBC had for its reruns, cheerfully suggesting that “It’s new to you!”? I’m often reminded of that when The New York Times covers comics. This time it’s about DC’s new line of graphic novels for teenaged girls, the horribly named Minx.

As Johanna Draper Carlson and Chris Butcher have already noted, DC is rather late to the party (and already showed up in a different outfit), but they’ve previously managed to convince the Times that Identity Crisis represented the maturation of the graphic novel, so it’s not surprising that they’ve passed this initiative off as innovative instead of belated.

It’s always mildly irritating when a comics publisher gets away with it, though, and frankly odd in this case. Draper Carlson noted at her blog that she mentioned Scholastic’s year-old Graphix line when interviewed, and she could just have easily brought up Tokyopop’s significant output of girl-friendly global manga, but the article sticks to the impression that DC is breaking ground.

DC VP Karen Berger’s first quote, “It’s time we got teenage girls reading comics,” reminded me of Dirk Deppey’s “She’s Got Her Own Thing Now” from The Comics Journal #269:

“It has now been conclusively demonstrated that the young female reader is, in fact, quite willing to buy comics. She just doesn't want yours.”

I wonder if another quote from Berger isn't an indirect (and reductive) swipe at available shôjo:

"Teenage girls, Ms. Berger said, are smart and sophisticated and 'about more than going out with the cute guy. This line of books gives them something to read that honors that intelligence and assertiveness and that individuality.'"

But perhaps I'm overly cynical. And what better name to express assertiveness, individuality, and a focus on more than mating rituals than Minx?

Admittedly, this bid for that sector of the audience seems likelier to succeed than any of their previous efforts. I like a lot of the creators involved, listed at Butcher’s blog, and I’m pleased to note that, for the most part, they’re talented and versatile graphic novelists, even if they haven’t written specifically for this audience before. Mike Carey is the closest thing to a “house DC writer” in evidence, but the prospect of him reuniting with My Faith in Frankie partners Sonny Liew and Marc Hempel is welcome news, no matter who’s publishing them or under what imprint.

Andi Watson is a versatile writer, and I’ve liked a lot of his comics, whether he’s worked as a writer-illustrator or just provided the script. (He also had the good sense to stand out of the way and let Simon Gane wow everyone in Paris from Slave Labor.) And the world needs more comics from Derek Kirk Kim, so First Second will just have to share.

Butcher notes the manga-esque packaging and pricing, which are eminently sensible, as it increases the likelihood of the target audience finding these books in places where they’re already going for their manga fix. (In my experience, bookstores tend to shelve by size when it comes to graphic novels. If it’s shaped like manga, it’s shelved with manga.)

I don’t know if I can really take issue with his assessment of CMX, DC’s manga line, as “designed to fail,” though I do think they’ve been making conscientious efforts to improve their product. They’ve spruced up the trade dress considerably (though it could hardly have been more generic at the outset) and are publishing intriguing titles like Emma, though marketing in general could be much stronger. (I’ll always be steamed by the fact that the wonderful Chikyu Misaki seemed to have to rely entirely on word of mouth.)

Given recent claims about DC's corporate culture, neatly summarized at the Newsarama blog, it would be easy to view this as a cynical cash grab. It probably is, but at least it's targeted at a burgeoning audience that's still underserved by traditional U.S. publishers instead of another bid to shake more money out of dedicated spandex fans. And it seems likely to produce some good books, so count me in the "cautiously optimistic" column.

Comments:
It’s always mildly irritating when a comics publisher gets away with it, though, and frankly odd in this case.

What sickens me is, they'll be able to aquire a nice hefty Diamond Previews page for this, while many OEL for girls gets shafted in obscurity, because they aren't D.C. Comics.
 
The prospect of the DC section of Previews getting thicker still isn't exactly thrilling, is it? On the other hand, if I was looking for books that I thought would appeal to young female readers, I would probably skip the DC/Dark Horse/Image section entirely. I wonder how many DM retailers are all that concerned with that sector of the audience to begin with?

But yeah, the publishers who rely on Previews and don't have the resources to crack the bookstore market all that widely sure won't benefit.
 
Wow, if that "about more than going out with the cute guy" line was a swipe at shoujo, Berger doesn't come off as having more than a casual understanding of those titles. There are plenty of popular shoujo titles that do fit that description but... well, I think Nana blows that presumption out of the water all on its own.

In my experience, bookstores tend to shelve by size when it comes to graphic novels. If it’s shaped like manga, it’s shelved with manga

For the most part, I see that as well with the occasional exception for some Oni titles (the ones with covers that look more like art house comix than magna) and the Marvel digest... you see more bookstores than I do, where do they fall for you?
 
I've seen both Oni and Marvel books like Runaways and Spider-Girl shelved with the manga more often than not. To be honest, I haven't seen many Oni books in chain stores period, which is too bad, but Scott Pilgrim shows up frequently on the digest-sized shelves rather than the GN sections.
 
You know, Ms. Carlson brought up something that occured to me also, after reading Ellis' reaction; this is about making money, and this is clearly editorial driven; the name Minx [which to me sounds way too much like Winx, comics for girls], --sounds so typically business as usual for DC.

I'm not saying editorial driven lines are bad [BLU exists because of Lillian Diaz-Przybyl, BUT BLU is what happens when a fan is also an editor, and that works out in the best interest of fans]--in this case, just listening to Karen Berger--does she really know what young teen girls are reading and why? Yes, because her marketing bible tells her so. 0_0.
 
From the sound of yesterday's Newsarama interview, the perceived reading list seems to consist of manga and Persepolis, so make of that what you will.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?